Fixed newline issue and adjusted wording in comment
This commit is contained in:
+2
-2
@@ -798,7 +798,7 @@ static void FIO_adjustMemLimitForPatchFromMode(FIO_prefs_t* const prefs,
|
|||||||
* If -f is specified with --rm, zstd will proceed as usual
|
* If -f is specified with --rm, zstd will proceed as usual
|
||||||
* If -q is specified with --rm, zstd will abort pre-emptively
|
* If -q is specified with --rm, zstd will abort pre-emptively
|
||||||
* If neither flag is specified, zstd will prompt the user for confirmation to proceed.
|
* If neither flag is specified, zstd will prompt the user for confirmation to proceed.
|
||||||
* If --rm is not specified, then zstd may print a warning to the user.
|
* If --rm is not specified, then zstd will print a warning to the user (which can be silenced with -q).
|
||||||
*/
|
*/
|
||||||
static int FIO_removeMultiFilesWarning(const FIO_prefs_t* const prefs, int displayLevelCutoff, const char* outFileName)
|
static int FIO_removeMultiFilesWarning(const FIO_prefs_t* const prefs, int displayLevelCutoff, const char* outFileName)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
@@ -819,8 +819,8 @@ static int FIO_removeMultiFilesWarning(const FIO_prefs_t* const prefs, int displ
|
|||||||
DISPLAYLEVEL(2, "\nThe concatenated output CANNOT regenerate the original directory tree. This is a destructive operation. ")
|
DISPLAYLEVEL(2, "\nThe concatenated output CANNOT regenerate the original directory tree. This is a destructive operation. ")
|
||||||
error = g_display_prefs.displayLevel > displayLevelCutoff && UTIL_requireUserConfirmation("Proceed? (y/n): ", "Aborting...", "yY");
|
error = g_display_prefs.displayLevel > displayLevelCutoff && UTIL_requireUserConfirmation("Proceed? (y/n): ", "Aborting...", "yY");
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
DISPLAY("\n");
|
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
DISPLAY("\n");
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
return error;
|
return error;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user