Typo and grammar fixes

lib/decompress/zstd_decompress_block.c

@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ static void ZSTD_allocateLiteralsBuffer(ZSTD_DCtx* dctx, void* const dst, const
             dctx->litBufferEnd = dctx->litBuffer + litSize - ZSTD_LITBUFFEREXTRASIZE;
         }
         else {
-            /* initially this will be stored entirely in dst during huffman decoding, it will partially shifted to litExtraBuffer after */
+            /* initially this will be stored entirely in dst during huffman decoding, it will partially be shifted to litExtraBuffer after */
             dctx->litBuffer = (BYTE*)dst + expectedWriteSize - litSize;
             dctx->litBufferEnd = (BYTE*)dst + expectedWriteSize;
         }
@@ -511,10 +511,10 @@ void ZSTD_buildFSETable_body(ZSTD_seqSymbol* dt,
             }
         }
         /* Now we spread those positions across the table.
-         * The benefit of doing it in two stages is that we avoid the the
+         * The benefit of doing it in two stages is that we avoid the
          * variable size inner loop, which caused lots of branch misses.
          * Now we can run through all the positions without any branch misses.
-         * We unroll the loop twice, since that is what emperically worked best.
+         * We unroll the loop twice, since that is what empirically worked best.
          */
         {
             size_t position = 0;
@@ -1189,7 +1189,7 @@ ZSTD_decodeSequence(seqState_t* seqState, const ZSTD_longOffset_e longOffsets)
         U32 const ofnbBits = ofDInfo->nbBits;
         /*
          * As gcc has better branch and block analyzers, sometimes it is only
-         * valuable to mark likelyness for clang, it gives around 3-4% of
+         * valuable to mark likeliness for clang, it gives around 3-4% of
          * performance.
          */