replaced `\+` by `*`.
`\+` means `[1-N]`,
while `*` means `[0-N]`,
so it's not strictly equivalent
but `\+` happens to be badly supported on some flavors of grep,
and for the purpose of these tests, `*` is good enough.
such scenario can happen, for example,
when trying a decompression-only benchmark on invalid data.
Other possibilities include an allocation error in an intermediate step.
So far, the benchmark would return immediately, but still return 0.
On command line, this would be confusing, as the program appears successful (though it does not display any successful message).
Now it returns !0, which can be interpreted as an error by command line.
`zstd` CLI has progressively moved to the policy of
ignoring `--rm` command when the output is `stdout`.
The primary drive is to feature a behavior more consistent with `gzip`,
when `--rm` is the default, but is also ignored when output is `stdout`.
Other policies are certainly possible, but would break from this `gzip` convention.
The new policy was inconsistenly enforced, depending on the exact list of commands.
For example, it was possible to circumvent it by using `-c --rm` in this order,
which would re-establish source removal.
- Update the CLI so that it necessarily catch these situations and ensure that `--rm` is always disabled when output is `stdout`.
- Added a warning message in this case (for verbosity 3 `-v`).
- Added an `assert()`, which controls that `--rm` is no longer active with `stdout`
- Added tests, which control the behavior, even when `--rm` is added after `-c`
- Removed some legacy code which where trying to apply a specific policy for the `stdout` + `--rm` case, which is no longer possible
* Fixing compiler warnings
* Replace the old -s flag with the -Wl,-s flag
* Fixing compiler warnings
* Fixing the linker strip flag and tests/code not working as expected on AIX
* Intial commit to address 3090. Added support to decompress empty block
* Update zstd_decompress_block.c
Addressed review comments for the case of 'set_basic'
* Update lib/decompress/zstd_decompress_block.c
Co-authored-by: Nick Terrell <nickrterrell@gmail.com>
* Update lib/decompress/zstd_decompress_block.c
Co-authored-by: Nick Terrell <nickrterrell@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Nick Terrell <nickrterrell@gmail.com>
* fix the assertion in readLinesFromFile
When the file is not terminated by endline, readLineFromFile will append
a '\0' for the last line. In this case pos + lineLength == dstCapacity.
* test: don't print very long text garbage
* playtests.sh: fix for a bug in macos' /bin/sh that persists temporary env vars when introduced before function calls
* cli-tests/run.py: Do not use existing ZSTD* envvars
Knowing the version of zlib/lz4/lzma we're linking against is very
useful for debugging issues with those libraries, so print it out in the
verbosity 4 version output.
Also print this information at the top of `playTests.sh`.
* Async IO decompression:
- Added --[no-]asyncio flag for CLI decompression.
- Replaced dstBuffer in decompression with a pool of write jobs.
- Added an ability to execute write jobs in a separate thread.
- Added an ability to wait (join) on all jobs in a thread pool (queued and running).
I hadn't seen #2890, so I wrote my own version. I like this approach a little
better, since it does an explicit check for a regular file, rather than
passing a magic value.
Addresses #2874.
51 MB seems excessive for CI storate and considering the nature of the test.
(note : maybe we should consider using `/tmp` for files generated during tests,
as tmpfs is typically using RAM, thus preserving storage.)
Allow the `dictContentSize` to be any size. The finalized dictionary
content size must be at least as large as the maximum repcode (8). So we
add zero bytes to the dictionary to ensure that we meet that
requirement.
I've removed this restriction because its been causing us headaches when
people complain that dictionary training failed. It fails because there
isn't enough useful content to put in the dictionary. Either because
every sample is exactly the same and less than ZDICT_CONTENTSIZE_MIN bytes,
or there isn't enough content. Instead, we should succeed in creating
the dictionary, and it is up to the user to decide if it is worthwhile.
It is possible that the tables alone provide enough value.
NOTE: This allows us to produce dictionaries with finalized
`dictContentSize < ZDICT_CONTENTSIZE_MIN`. But, they are still valid
zstd dictionaries. We could remove the `ZDICT_CONTENTSIZE_MIN` macro,
but I've decided to leave that for now, so we don't break users.
Po-Chuan Hsieh